Thursday, June 30, 2005

The Long Emergency by James Howard Kunstler raises ethics questions

Kunstler's book asks "What's going to happen as we start running out of cheap gas to guzzle?". If you haven't been following the oil depletion thread this is a good place to get updated. (Link)

One thing I have been musing over: I quote the Rolling Stone article " The turbulence of the Long Emergency will produce a lot of economic losers, and many of these will be members of an angry and aggrieved former middle class."

That's you and me probably.

As I see it there are some simple options open to us. But before we consider them we should maybe take a step back and consider, as we are going into a period where everyone will lose something, where we stand on equality.

If we could, given the dark prospects painted by Kunstler, chart a course out, would it be towards

A society where everyone competes with everyone for the remaining food

A society where everyone helps out to see at least everyone is fed, watered, clothed, sheltered and secure.

Society where the less fortunate are helped to the extent they are helped

A society recognising the sun shines on everyone equally aims for shared common standards .

Before you consider these different stands we could take the biologist's view. Given that the community will undergo resource stress, what is the attitude that will best ensure the long term survival of the community?

1 comment:

Tom Naka said...

Just thought i would say hi from Japan. Doing some blog surfing and found your site. Im looking for some cool styles of health resource sexual
for my own blog. Theres some really amazing blogs about. if you have time check out my site you will find information on health resource sexual
. Well when i get my blog running hope you come and check it out.

Add to Technorati Favorites